AhlulBayt News Agency (ABNA): Amid mounting reports of a severe deterioration in former Prime Minister Imran Khan’s eyesight while in detention, a new wave of criticism has emerged over the treatment of the ex-premier by Pakistan’s ruling institutions. Some analysts view the developments as a sign of a deepening political crisis and an erosion of the power structure’s legitimacy in Islamabad.
According to published reports, if claims of significant damage to Imran Khan’s eyesight prove accurate, critics argue the issue cannot be regarded merely as a medical or administrative matter. Instead, they interpret it as a new phase of organized pressure against one of the most influential political figures in Pakistan’s 78-year history.
Concentration of Power in Detention
Analysts note that under detention conditions, full control over a prisoner’s access to light, medical care, sleep, and communications rests with the authorities. They emphasize that any physical deterioration occurring in such circumstances cannot be separated from the responsibility of the relevant institutions.
From this perspective, potential harm to Imran Khan’s health is seen as a continuation of a broader trajectory over the past four years, marked by the large-scale arrest of his supporters and sweeping political restrictions.
In this context, the name of Asim Munir, Pakistan’s army chief, has surfaced in political analyses. Some critics accuse the current power structure of playing a decisive role in shaping the political landscape through alleged election engineering, pressure on media outlets, and influence over judicial processes—allegations that officials have consistently denied.
Political Deadlock and Widening Divisions
Observers say Imran Khan’s continued detention has not diminished his popular support; in some instances, it has reinforced his symbolic standing. They argue that hardline measures, rather than eroding his social base, have fostered greater cohesion among his supporters.
Reports also point to an extensive deployment of security forces and the installation of physical barriers in Pakistan’s capital. Critics interpret these measures not as signs of strength, but as indications of official concern over the potential spread of protests.
At the same time, some unofficial sources have reported signs of dissatisfaction among mid-ranking members of the security forces, claims that, if substantiated, could affect the cohesion of the power structure. However, authorities have not confirmed such assertions.
International Repercussions
Recent developments have also drawn international attention. According to analysts, Pakistan’s military leadership is seeking to project an image of stability and control to foreign partners, particularly the United States. Nonetheless, intensified crackdowns on opponents and reports concerning detainees’ conditions have raised questions about the country’s political outlook.
On the international stage, figures such as Donald Trump, the President of the United States, and Marco Rubio, the U.S. Secretary of State, have adopted a more pragmatic approach toward allied governments. Even so, political risk assessments of Pakistan in certain diplomatic and financial circles have reportedly become more cautious.
Outlook
Observers warn that continued pressure on Imran Khan, combined with expanding political and social rifts, could further intensify polarization in Pakistan. Any additional escalation, they caution, may heighten domestic tensions and further complicate the country’s political equations.
With one side relying on formal instruments of state power and the other drawing on broad popular backing, Pakistan’s political future appears more uncertain than at any point in recent years.
**************
End/ 345A
